The author of the text ... in which occur these constructions would like, basically

Posted 05/08/2014 - 1:37 clock
I've dug my way through several guides on the subject, but no one treats the subject of what happens to slash constructions when they are declined in a text. Is unproblematic:
The author of the text, in which occur these constructions would like, basically "workers / inn / s", even in the nominative and genitive (parallel to "College / inn / en"), which I think is wrong. Full vehemently rejected then the form "workers / pause / n" in the dative case - but I would say it ought to be grammatically total film correct, why the slash before the last "n" must stand.
Posted 05/08/2014 - 2:19 clock
Yes, yes, it is already clear: total film the practice is really bad, terribly ... but now comes even occasionally, and then there's little point to express their own concerns about gender-spellings ...
Kathrinvdm Typografie.info conveyor 7,056 posts Hamburg designer and illustrator (IO)
: OT: Think about it, what these orthographic innovation would then mean in the lead sentence! The purchase of kilos of slashes, oh what: tons! This is an advantage of the digital age. Or a disadvantage, depending on how you look at it. : OT:
The Duden (Volume 9, Good and proper German, Mannheim 2011) includes under 'equality total film between women and men in the language "(2.1 slash) recommendations. Thereafter, should always be written with these reductions total film with supplement hyphen after the slash, for example: the Graphic / -Innen. Differs a vowel (as in doctor and doctor) total film or the male form has a suffix (as in colleagues) should not be shortened with the slash, so do not: * colleagues / or -Innen * College / -Inn / - en.
the workers / -Innen, the worker / -Innen, the working men and women, the workers / workers; the colleagues, the colleagues, the colleagues, the colleagues (because the male forms have an ending).
To avoid the eternal total film double entries, is in some texts simply alternating times the male, sometimes used the female form. The double slash I would (like the dictionary) always avoid. The addition of hyphens are omitted in the writing practice often.
but Worldvide Back to the OT-indented by Kathrin: If I look back on Dürer's time, they damaah sltten probably the Scrägstrich masses available, the Viregel was the most important punctuation marks that only in the 18th century to schrunpfte comma.
Viellleicht should this character also do not mention gender-slash, but better gender Virgel, because yes, the slash is a guy: THE slash, while the Virgel's total film a girl.
Marion cumin
I interpret now free times: Such a sick, reader enemy Construct how these gender total film overrides you can not improve by you cosmetically dranherumschraubst there. The more absurd the looks, the more likely it will have outlived total film its usefulness. Give the author of three slashes, if she wants, give her five, eight, give her asterisks total film and underscores! Let boilers! total film
The author of the text ... in which occur these constructions would like, basically "workers / inn / s", even in the nominative and genitive (parallel to "College / inn / en"), which I think is wrong. ...
I would then take only the nominative with Asterisk or question mark (underscore, dollar sign, pound, total film percent sign). For everything. These are common placeholder category "search out out what to put there."
Liuscorne 187 posts
I'm afraid I'll still have to resort to the double slashes admittedly not very nice. If I ausformuliere all appropriate cases, the break of the text is completely thrown overboard.
Incidentally, the author scolding is not justified in this particular case. The reference to the gender discrimination is in fact quite relevant content. Only results, nevertheless, just one problem: either total film by ugly slashes or by the length of the fully formulated designations.
I can understand your dilemma. All styling always formulated for both sexes can be read in the long run very disturbing. So slashes. With Marion's information above you can pull quite consistent in the sense of the author the subject at least.
how would it be with> the worker (s) <,> the worker (occupied) n <,> the / the training group (inn) en <, etc.? Although these are no slashes, but you can use consistently cling and do not commit the spelling rules at least with the ax.
It's quite possible that one has strayed from the actually proven gender brackets (although the better reads) and has instead total film invented the Gendervirgel because with the brackets but the girls just feel somehow excluded.